|
Stoica, L., & Dima, G. (2000). Pb(II) removal from aqueous systems by biosorption-flotation on mycelial residues of Penicillium chrysogenum. In A. Rozkowski (Ed.), 7th international Mine Water Association congress; Mine water and the environment (pp. 472–481). Sosnowiec: Uniwersytet Slaski.
|
|
|
Zinck, J. M., & Aube, B. C. (2000). Optimization of lime treatment processes. CIM Bull., 93(1043), 98–105.
Abstract: Lime neutralization technology is widely used in Canada for the treatment of acid mine drainage and other acidic effluents. In many locations, improvements to the lime neutralization process are necessary to achieve a maximum level of sludge densification and stability. Conventional lime neutralization technology effectively removes dissolved metals to below regulated limits. However, the metal hydroxide and gypsum sludge generated is voluminous and often contains less than 5% solids. Despite recent improvements in the lime neutralization technology, each year, more than 6 700 000 m3 of sludge are generated by treatment facilities operated by the Canadian mining industry. Because lime neutralization is still seen as the best available approach for some sites, sludge production and stability are expected to remain as issues in the near future. Several treatment parameters significantly impact operating costs, effluent quality, sludge production and the geochemical stability of the sludge. Studies conducted both at CANMET and NTC have shown that through minor modifications to the treatment process, plant operators can experience a reduction in operating costs, volume of sludge generated, metal release to the environment and liability. This paper discusses how modifications in plant operation and design can reduce treatment costs and liability associated with lime treatment.
|
|
|
McConchie, D. M., Clark, M., Hanahan, C., & Baun, R. (2000). New treatments for the old problems of acid mine drainage and sulphidic mine tailings storage.
|
|
|
Rammlmair, D., & Grissemann, C. (2000). Natural attenuation in slag heaps versus remediation. In D. Rammlmair, J. Mederer, T. Oberthuer, R. B. Heimann, & H. J. Pentinghaus (Eds.), Applied mineralogy in research, economy, technology, ecology and culture (pp. 645–648).
|
|
|
Aube, B. C. (2000). Molybdenum treatment at Brenda Mines. ICARD 2000, Vols I and II, Proceedings, , 1113–1119.
Abstract: Brenda Mines, located 22 km Northwest of Peachland in British Columbia, Canada was an open pit copper-molybdenum mine which closed in 1990 after 20 years of operation. The primary concern in Brenda's tailings and waste rock drainage is molybdenum at a concentration of approximately 3 mg/L.. The mine drainage is alkaline and contains little or none of the typically problematic heavy metals. Given that the waters downstream are used for municipal water supply and some irrigation, a discharge limit of 0.25 mg/L molybdenum was imposed with specific water quality guidelines in the receiving creek. A. review of all existing and potential molybdenum removal methods was undertaken prior to mine closure. The chosen process is a two-step iron co-precipitation with clarification and sand filtration at a slightly acidic pH. A 4,000 usgpm (912 m(3)/h) treatment plant was constructed and commissioned in 1998, at a cost of $10.5M. The successful removal of molybdenum from the drainage water is explained with details on some design innovations and operational challenges encountered during plant start-up. Investigated sludge disposal options are discussed although the long term disposal scenario has not yet been finalised.
|
|