|
|
Aytas, S. O., Akyil, S., Aslani, M. A. A., & Aytekin, U. (1999). Removal of uranium from aqueous solutions by diatomite (Kieselguhr). Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 240(3), 973–976.
|
|
|
|
Bagdy, I., & Kaocsány, L. (1982). Treatment of mine water for the protection of pumps. Proceedings, 1st International Mine Water Congress, Budapest, Hungary, ABCD Supplementary volume, 201–214.
|
|
|
|
Ballard, J. J. (1995). Parametric study for metal ion removal from acid mine water using Rhizopus javanicus. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Montana, Montana Tech, Montana.
|
|
|
|
Ballivy, G., & Bienvenu, L. (1998). Stabilisation des rejets miniers a l'aide de rejets de cimenterie. Stabilization of mining wastes using cement factory wastes Activites de recherche du Ministere des Ressources Naturelles du Quebec sur le drainage minier acide; rapport 1997-1998. Research activities of the Quebec Natural Resources Ministry on acid mine drainage; report 1997-1998 (Vol. Rn 98-5034).
|
|
|
|
Banks, S. B. (2003). The Coal Authority Minewater Treatment Programme: An update on the performance of operational schemes. Land Contam. Reclam., 11(2), 161–164.
Abstract: The performance of mine water treatment schemes, operated under the Coal Authority's national Minewater Treatment Programme, is summarised. Most schemes for which data are available perform successfully and remove over 90% iron. Mean area-adjusted iron removal rates for reedbed components of treatment schemes, range from 1.5 to 5.5 g Fe/m2, with percentage iron removal rates ranging from 68% to 99%. In the majority of cases, calculated area-adjusted removal rates are limited by influent iron loadings, and the empirical sizing criterion for aerobic wetlands, based on American removal rates of 10 g Fe/m2day, remains a valuable tool in the initial stages of treatment system design and estimation of land area requirements. Where a number of schemes have required modification after becoming operational, due consideration must always be given to the potential for dramatic increases in influent iron loadings, and to how the balance between performance efficiency and aesthetic appearance can best be achieved. Continual review and feedback on the performance of treatment systems, and the problems encountered during design implementation, will enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Minewater Treatment Programme within the UK.
|
|
