|
Agency, U. S. E. P., & Development, O. of R. and. (2006). Active and semi-passive lime treatment of acid mine drainage at Leviathan Mine, California. Cincinnati, OH: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
|
|
Costello, C. (2003). (U. S. E. P. A. O. of S. W. and E. R. T. I. O. W. DC, Ed.). Acid Mine Drainage – Innovative Treatment Technologies. Washington: National Network for Environmental Management Studies Program.
|
|
Walton-Day, K. (2003). (R. Raeside, Ed.). Short Course Series Volume. 31: Mineralogical Association of Canada.
|
|
Baskin, L. (1979). Linear relationship between mine flow-acid load and influence of depositional environment. In Underground coal mining symposium. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
|
Sapsford, D., Barnes, A., Dey, M., Williams, K., Jarvis, A., & Younger, P. (2007). (R. Cidu, & F. Frau, Eds.). Water in Mining Environments. Cagliari: Mako Edizioni.
Abstract: This paper presents iron removal data from a novel low footprint mine water treatment system. The paper discusses possible design configurations and demonstrates that the system could treat 1 L/s of mine water containing 8.4 mg/L of iron to < 1 mg/L with a system footprint of 66 m2. A conventional lagoon and aerobic wetland system would require at least 160 m2 to achieve the same treatment. Other advantages of the system are that it produces a clean and dense sludge amenable to on-site storage and possible recycling and that heavy plant will generally not be required for construction.
|
